RECONCILING TWO “SEEMING” OPPOSITES
Personal Reminiscence, Philosophy/Spirituality, Culture, Politics Add comments“We must begin by acknowledging the hard truth that we will not eradicate violent conflict in our lifetimes. There will be times when nations - acting individually or in concert - will find the use of force not only necessary but morally justified.
“I make this statement mindful of what Martin Luther King said in this same ceremony years ago - “Violence never brings permanent peace. It solves no social problem: it merely creates new and more complicated ones.” As someone who stands here as a direct consequence of Dr. King’s life’s work, I am living testimony to the moral force of non-violence. I know there is nothing weak -nothing passive - nothing naïve - in the creed and lives of Gandhi and King.
“But as a head of state sworn to protect and defend my nation, I cannot be guided by their examples alone. I face the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people. For make no mistake: evil does exist in the world. A non-violent movement could not have halted Hitler’s armies. Negotiations cannot convince al Qaeda’s leaders to lay down their arms. To say that force is sometimes necessary is not a call to cynicism - it is a recognition of history; the imperfections of man and the limits of reason.”
As someone who sees himself as dedicated to helping to raise consciousness in the world - to being involved in looking for ways to encourage the expansion of human potential and dialogue between peoples (see my website www.Enrichment.com, and tune into my Internet spiritual radio show “The Enrichment Hour” on The Sedona Talk Radio Network [http://www.sedonatalkradio.com/the-enrichment-hour]), I am part of that group of millions who wish to help build a better world that allows for a real worldwide peace that constitutes the forward movement of human development and creativity, and human progress in science AND the human heart. That said, I am also the son of German Jewish parents who fled Nazi Germany, and whose father lost his beloved mother and brothers and sisters to the awful hand of Hitler’s extermination squads. My father, along with others who survived the Holocaust, was a wonderful man who used to tell me to “never judge another human being by his or her race or religion.” I came to know too that he never totally recovered from the anguish of his losses, nor later the losses of his buddies who he fought with as a soldier in Darby’s First Ranger Battalion during World War II.
It was in part, I think, my awareness of my father’s experiences that brought to life my understanding of the horrors of war and totalitarianism, and my dedication to in some way work to build a gentler, kinder world. I’ve come to understand that “consciousness” is the key, and that we must dedicate ourselves to first, developing our own consciousness, which includes acknowledging both the shadow side within us and working on the elimination of our own demons, along with accessing our inner greatness and gaining an understanding of our unique talents and missions - followed by helping in some way to inspire others to do the same.
I became momentarily discouraged as a consequence of 9/11, wondering if all the work of so many to build the better world, was in vain. I quickly snapped out of it, though, recognizing that the forward march of consciousness has always encountered challenges and seeming setbacks. Our duty, it seems to me, is to counter the adversarial forces with steadfastness of purpose - and I came to recognize that that steadfastness included the reconciliation of two “seeming” opposites: first, a commitment to spiritual/humanitarian growth and development; and second, our recognition that “evil” in the world must sometimes be aggressively challenged.
I urge those of you who have not read President Obama’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech to read it. MSNBC has a full online transcript at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34360743/ns/politics-white_house/
Those of you who have read my postings on this blog know that I did not vote for President Obama. McCain was my choice in part because I knew that he would not take lightly the Al Quaida threat, and do his utmost to protect our country and encourage other nations to join forces to help rid the world of this tyrannical force.
That said, I think that this speech brilliantly outlines the recognition of this force and the necessity to combat it ALONG WITH the need to build the better world we all yearn for.
Whether the President is fully up to implementing an effective war on terrorism IN ACTION, however, is open to question. He and his Administration handled the Northwest Airline bomber incident disastrously. He has recognized the system failed, but has not yet shown his willingness to put into place more effective, experienced and competent people to safeguard our national security. Janet Napolitano, and others, should be replaced as soon as possible. It remains to be seen how and when this will happen. Hopefully it will happen soon.
I believe that “kindness” and “strength” can co-exist. Spiritual/creative/human development can and must continue - for they represent the inexorable upside impulse in Evolution - and the willingness to confront “evil” in the world must simultaneously be accepted as a decision of necessity in order to ensure a safer and freer world that allows the forward movement of consciousness to continue.
I view “evil” as the absence of light and spiritual awareness. Whatever it is, if it impinges on our right to exist and/or to live as free men and women, it must be fought.
January 12th, 2010 at 6:12 pm
Mike,
I admire your noble thoughts, but I do have a problem with fighting
“evil” and even the definition of “evil”. Certainly, if the USA pursued all
those we consider “evil”, we would completely deplete our treasury
and the young people that are called on to do the fighting. I insist
that our energies and resources be spent only in pursuing those
that attack us. Anyone who fights against all “evil” is bound to go
down, because it seems a little senseless to keep fighting the
Crusades of the Middle Ages. You might also remember that those
you think of as “evil”, think of us as “evil”.
Jack Nadel
January 12th, 2010 at 11:17 pm
Jack - I appreciate your comment. I am willing to be wrong, and I respect your views. You are one of those who fought in World War II, and you have experienced much in the world. Each of us comes from a different perspective. For me, I saw my father sometimes go into a corner and cry for his mother, who in Dortmund, Germany was bayoneted by the Nazis as she nobly tried to save her children as they were being dragged into a truck headed for the railroad and the concentration camp.
The effect of the Holocaust on my father never completely left him. The anguish of not being there to save his mother and brothers and sisters was overwhelming.
Where was Roosevelt and the American Administration, who knew what was happening, to save the European Jewish population who were being slaughtered? Where were America’s allies?
Indeed, we were at war with the Nazis. Were we only to fight their armies in battle on the grounds that they declared war on us, when a humanitarian crisis of huge proportions was taking placed in Germany and Eastern Europe?
Where was America and the United Nations when millions were being slaughtered in Rwanda? Where were we when the same was happening - and may still be happening in the Sudan?
This is the “evil” I speak of, and it’s my concern that extremist Islamic forces, who it seems to me have hijacked the Qur’an into something used as an excuse to destroy our civilization and bring the world back into the 7th Century, must be confronted - if not by war then by a very aggressive strategy to halt their assault on the Western world.
The brilliance of Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it seems to me, is that a standard was set, which was agreed to by all the nations of the world, that, to quote the Preamble:
“Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
“Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,
“Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law…”.
I’m not referring to amorphous or abstract “evil” - but a tyrannical force that has wreaped genocide or destruction on innocent people.
I’m an American citizen but I also feel that I’m a citizen of the world and that all humans are interconnected and are protected by international law, and minimally by a moral code of reverence for life codified in all the world’s major religions.
I agree with you that when we do our utmost to save people from this kind of tyranny we must be very careful. I did think that going into Iraq was an excuse to wage war on a country that was not involved in 9/11.
I also do think that we must evaluate every situation carefully and make sure we’re not overreacting. But the defense of innocents, whether overseas or the defense of innocents here, requires a response of conscience.
It’s arguable whether we should be in Afghanistan, though I do think it’s defensible to be proactive in not dealing with the Al Aquada threat on a passive basis. Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister came away from Munich with a letter signed by Hitler saying there would be “Peace In Our Time.”
I don’t believe in violence, Jack, and I do think violence begets violence and that we must look for every possible way to encourage the peaceful settlement of disputes. I also think that the Consciousness movement must continue since it represents the Evolutionary impulse to take humanity to a higher level. But how are we to deal with tyranny when it spits us in the eye?
I appreciate your thoughts very much, as I think this kind of dialogue is very important; and I know for sure that you and I are committed to dialogue.
I also encourage the readers of this blog to visit your own great site, www.CommunicationIsInspiration.com
Best,
Mike